?? manual.10.html
字號(hào):
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML EXPERIMENTAL 970324//EN"><HTML><HEAD><META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Adobe FrameMaker 5.5/HTML Export Filter"><LINK REL="STYLESHEET" HREF="Manual.css"><TITLE> Scoring</TITLE></HEAD><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"><H2 CLASS="Heading-3"><A NAME="pgfId=5319"> </A><A NAME="30177"> </A><A NAME="marker=11805"> </A>Scoring</H2><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=8521"> </A>Dock uses several types of scoring functions to discriminate among orientations and molecules. Scoring is requested using the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#35823" CLASS="XRef">score_ligand</A> parameter. Each scoring function is treated independently during the calculation and results are written to separate output files. In order to combine the results of two or more scoring functions, apply the additional functions in separate post-docking scoring calculations.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=12873"> </A>Dock will score the interactions of a ligand with the receptor if the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#34124" CLASS="XRef">intermolecular_score</A> parameter is set. If <A HREF="Manual.19.html#22201" CLASS="XRef">flexible_ligand</A> is set, then dock will score the interactions between rigid segments within a molecule if the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#27914" CLASS="XRef">intramolecular_score</A> parameter is set. The total score is the sum of the intramolecular score and the intermolecular score, EXCEPT when different molecules are being compared for a <A HREF="Manual.19.html#25701" CLASS="XRef">rank_ligands</A> list. After a flexible molecule has been docked, and it is being considered for the ranked ligand list, then the total score is set equal to only the intermolecular score plus whatever size penalty the user has specified with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#56025" CLASS="XRef">contact_size_penalty</A> parameter and so on for each type of scoring.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10361"> </A>To enable rapid score evaluation during docking, the score potentials are precalculated on a three-dimensial grid using <A HREF="Manual.1b.html#37839" CLASS="XRef">grid</A>. However, <A NAME="marker=11815"> </A>continuum scoring may be performed by turning off the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#41535" CLASS="XRef">gridded_score</A> flag. Continuum scoring may be used to evaluate a ligand:receptor complex without the investment of a grid calculation, or to perform a more detailed calculation without the numerical approximation of the grid. Continuum scoring is also triggered when an <A HREF="Manual.19.html#27914" CLASS="XRef">intramolecular_score</A> is requested, but is only used for intramolecular score terms. When continuum scoring is requested, then score parameters normally supplied to <A HREF="Manual.1b.html#37839" CLASS="XRef">grid</A>, must also be supplied to dock. It is left to the user to make sure consistent values are supplied to both programs. Older grids calculated by chemgrid may also be read by specifying a value of 3.5 for the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#22380" CLASS="XRef">grid_version</A> parameter.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10673"> </A>The score is used to identify interesting orientations and molecules. If a top-scoring list is requested, like <A HREF="Manual.19.html#23984" CLASS="XRef">rank_orientations</A> or <A HREF="Manual.19.html#25701" CLASS="XRef">rank_ligands</A>, then dock will maintain a sorted list of a user-defined length for output. But if sorted lists are not requested, then dock will need to know what score cutoff to use to write out orientations or molecules. This cutoff is supplied by the user with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#27692" CLASS="XRef">contact_maximum</A> parameter and so on for each scoring function. This score cutoff may be overridden for orientations near the input orientation using the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#21445" CLASS="XRef">rmsd_override</A> parameter.</P><DIV><H3 CLASS="Heading-4"><A NAME="pgfId=10311"> </A><A NAME="marker=11816"> </A>Bump Filter</H3><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10316"> </A>Orientations may be filtered prior to scoring to discard those in which the molecule significantly overlaps receptor atoms. This feature is enabled with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#42188" CLASS="XRef">bump_filter</A> flag, but is only available if the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#41535" CLASS="XRef">gridded_score</A> flag is also set. At the time of construction of the bump filter, the amount of atom VDW overlap is defined with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#23822" CLASS="XRef">bump_overlap</A> parameter. At the time of bump evaluation the number of allowed bumps is defined with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#26093" CLASS="XRef">bump_maximum</A> parameter. If <A NAME="marker=11818"> </A><A HREF="Manual.10.html#23381" CLASS="XRef">Score Optimization</A> is being performed, then a few number of bumps should be allowed, since the minimizer can recover from such clashes. In addition, a few bumps often indicate an orientation that interacts intimately with the site and often leads to a strongly favorable orientation after minimization.</P></DIV><DIV><H3 CLASS="Heading-4"><A NAME="pgfId=8552"> </A><A NAME="marker=11817"> </A>Contact Score</H3><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10307"> </A>The contact score function is enabled with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#36064" CLASS="XRef">contact_score</A> flag. The contact score is a simple summation of the number of heavy atom contacts between the ligand and receptor. At the time of construction of the contact scoring grid, the distance threshold defining a contact is set with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#19748" CLASS="XRef">contact_cutoff_distance</A>. Atom VDW overlaps are penalized by checking the bump filter grid, or with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#25056" CLASS="XRef">contact_clash_overlap</A> parameter for the intramolecular score. The amount of penalty is specified with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#36640" CLASS="XRef">contact_clash_penalty</A> parameter.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10409"> </A>The contact score provides a simple assessment of shape complementarity. It can be useful for evaluating primarily non-polar interactions.</P></DIV><DIV><H3 CLASS="Heading-4"><A NAME="pgfId=10254"> </A><A NAME="marker=11819"> </A>Energy Score</H3><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10414"> </A>The energy score is activated with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#23338" CLASS="XRef">energy_score</A> parameter. It is based on the non-bonded terms of the molecular mechanic force field (please refer to <A HREF="Manual.1c.html#29459" CLASS="XRef">Equation 1 on page 74</A> for more background). During grid construction (and continuum scoring) every term in the function may be tailored by the user. The distance dependence of the Coulombic function is set with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#33818" CLASS="XRef">distance_dielectric</A> parameter. The dielectric constant is adjusted with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#24740" CLASS="XRef">dielectric_factor</A> parameter. The distance dependence of the Lennard-Jones function is set with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#12372" CLASS="XRef">attractive_exponent</A> and <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#24040" CLASS="XRef">repulsive_exponent</A> parameters. Typically a 6-12 potential is used, but it can be softened up by using a 6-8 or 6-9 potential. Regardless of the exponent values selected, the same radii and well-depths are used. The VDW well-depths and radii are stored in an editable file (see <A HREF="Manual.46.html#25447" CLASS="XRef">vdw.defn on page 105</A>) which is identified with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#22067" CLASS="XRef">vdw_definition_file</A> parameter. In addition, the model for non-polar hydrogens may be selected with the <A HREF="Manual.1e.html#33172" CLASS="XRef">atom_model</A> parameter. With a united-atom model, the non-polar hydrogens are given zero VDW potentials and any partial charge residing on them is transferred to the adjacent carbon. The united atom model provides a smoother intermolecular potential which requires fewer steps of minimization. However, the all-atom model is more accurate, and perhaps captures some aromatic interaction coulombic terms otherwise missing.</P></DIV><DIV><H3 CLASS="Heading-4"><A NAME="pgfId=8536"> </A><A NAME="18383"> </A>Chemical Score</H3><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10467"> </A>Chemical scoring allows the energy scoring function to be further tailored to enhance recognition of chemical complementarity. The attractive portion of the VDW term can often dominate the energy for uncharged molecules. With chemical scoring this term is scaled depending on the chemical labels assigned to the interacting atoms. It is activated by the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#15150" CLASS="XRef">chemical_score</A> parameter. The chemical labels and definitions are the same as those for chemical matching (see <A HREF="Manual.47.html#97377" CLASS="XRef">chem.defn on page 106</A>). The chemical interaction table resides in an editable file (see <A HREF="Manual.49.html#16204" CLASS="XRef">chem_score.tbl on page 108</A>) and is identified with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#30595" CLASS="XRef">chemical_score_file</A> parameter.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10488"> </A>Chemical scoring can be used to incorporate qualitative aspects of solvation. For instance hydrophobic-polar interactions can be made non-attractive or even repulsive. Further, it can be used to screen for molecules that contain a particular functional group (in concert with <A HREF="Manual.e.html#85567" CLASS="XRef">Chemical Matching</A>) for presentation to a receptor active site. The interaction table could also be derived using statistical techniques from binding and structure data to improve the modeling of a particular site or class of sites.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=12903"> </A>Chemical scoring is used for intermolecular scoring only. If intramolecular score is requested, then the regular energy score is computed for internal energy.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=12902"> </A>This type of scoring should be considered experimental. Parameterization is left to the user. It should be used at your own risk.</P></DIV><DIV><H3 CLASS="Heading-4"><A NAME="pgfId=8564"> </A>RMSD Score</H3><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10493"> </A>The RMSD score evaluates of the difference in conformation and orientation of two identical molecules. It is available when <A HREF="Manual.19.html#41535" CLASS="XRef">gridded_score</A> is not requested and is activated by the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#31159" CLASS="XRef">rmsd_score</A> parameter. The reference molecule is supplied with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#27747" CLASS="XRef">receptor_atom_file</A>, and the molecule to check is supplied with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#35951" CLASS="XRef">ligand_atom_file</A>, which may contain multiple molecules.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10513"> </A>Since the RMSD is treated as a score, it may in fact be minimized. This procedure is useful for evaluating the difference of a CONCORD conformation from crystal conformation.</P></DIV><DIV><H3 CLASS="Heading-4"><A NAME="pgfId=8542"> </A><A NAME="23381"> </A>Score Optimization</H3><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10518"> </A>Score optimization allows the conformation and orientation of a molecule to be adjusted to improve the score. Although the calculation is expensive, it makes the conformation and orientation search more efficient because less sampling becomes necessary. Optimization is activated with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#36933" CLASS="XRef">minimize_ligand</A> parameter. The optimizer currently uses the simplex algorithm which does not require evaluation of derivatives. It does however depend on a random number generator which makes it not only sensitive to the initial seed provided with <A HREF="Manual.19.html#10903" CLASS="XRef">random_seed</A> parameter, but also to the order of evaluation. So results will vary if molecules are supplied in a different order. The amount of variance should be small, though. For detailed calculations, it is recommended that the optimization be repeated with different random number seeds to check convergence.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10550"> </A>The initial step size of the minimizer is specified with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#28703" CLASS="XRef">initial_translation</A>, <A HREF="Manual.19.html#21978" CLASS="XRef">initial_rotation</A>, and <A HREF="Manual.19.html#42531" CLASS="XRef">initial_torsion</A> parameters. The length of minimization may be controlled with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#19339" CLASS="XRef">maximum_iterations</A> parameter.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10541"> </A>Even if several scoring functions have been requested, not all need to be minimized. Specification of which functions are to be minimized is done with <A HREF="Manual.19.html#39678" CLASS="XRef">contact_minimize</A> and so forth for each scoring function. The termination criteria of minimization is specified with <A HREF="Manual.19.html#17504" CLASS="XRef">contact_convergence</A> and so forth.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10551"> </A>Since minimization may converge prematurely, each call to the minimizer is actually composed of multiple cycles. The number of cycles is controlled with the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#24031" CLASS="XRef">maximum_cycles</A> parameter. Additional cycles of minimization are spawned if the previous simplex has made a significant difference in the conformation or orientation AND if the score has passed below a threshold set by the user. The difference in configuration is measured by the vector magnitude of the final simplex vertex array. The difference must exceed the <A HREF="Manual.19.html#18440" CLASS="XRef">cycle_convergence</A> parameter to be significant. A value of 1.0 for this parameter would correspond to at least one of the simplex vertices moving a distance equal to the initial step size. The score threshold prevents repeated cycles of minimization of a configuration that is really of no interest. The score threshold is set with <A HREF="Manual.19.html#22058" CLASS="XRef">contact_termination</A> an so forth for each scoring function.</P><P CLASS="Body"><A NAME="pgfId=10587"> </A>The performance of the minimizer can be monitored using the <A HREF="Manual.17.html#27477" CLASS="XRef">-p</A> flag (see <A HREF="Manual.17.html#20437" CLASS="XRef">Command-line Arguments on page 53</A> and <A HREF="Manual.1a.html#38444" CLASS="XRef">Performance on page 73</A>).</P><DIV><H6 CLASS="New-Page"><A NAME="pgfId=11421"> </A> </H6></DIV></DIV><CENTER><P>?? 快捷鍵說(shuō)明
復(fù)制代碼
Ctrl + C
搜索代碼
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切換主題
Ctrl + Shift + D
顯示快捷鍵
?
增大字號(hào)
Ctrl + =
減小字號(hào)
Ctrl + -