亚洲欧美第一页_禁久久精品乱码_粉嫩av一区二区三区免费野_久草精品视频

? 歡迎來到蟲蟲下載站! | ?? 資源下載 ?? 資源專輯 ?? 關于我們
? 蟲蟲下載站

?? rfc3551.txt

?? 完整的RTP RTSP代碼庫
?? TXT
?? 第 1 頁 / 共 5 頁
字號:
      unicast and multicast UDP as well as TCP.  (This does not preclude      the use of these definitions when RTP is carried by other lower-      layer protocols.)   Transport mapping: The standard mapping of RTP and RTCP to      transport-level addresses is used.   Encapsulation: This profile leaves to applications the      specification of RTP encapsulation in protocols other than UDP.3.  Registering Additional Encodings   This profile lists a set of encodings, each of which is comprised of   a particular media data compression or representation plus a payload   format for encapsulation within RTP.  Some of those payload formats   are specified here, while others are specified in separate RFCs.  It   is expected that additional encodings beyond the set listed here will   be created in the future and specified in additional payload format   RFCs.   This profile also assigns to each encoding a short name which MAY be   used by higher-level control protocols, such as the Session   Description Protocol (SDP), RFC 2327 [6], to identify encodings   selected for a particular RTP session.   In some contexts it may be useful to refer to these encodings in the   form of a MIME content-type.  To facilitate this, RFC 3555 [7]   provides registrations for all of the encodings names listed here as   MIME subtype names under the "audio" and "video" MIME types through   the MIME registration procedure as specified in RFC 2048 [8].   Any additional encodings specified for use under this profile (or   others) may also be assigned names registered as MIME subtypes with   the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA).  This registry   provides a means to insure that the names assigned to the additional   encodings are kept unique.  RFC 3555 specifies the information that   is required for the registration of RTP encodings.   In addition to assigning names to encodings, this profile also   assigns static RTP payload type numbers to some of them.  However,   the payload type number space is relatively small and cannot   accommodate assignments for all existing and future encodings.   During the early stages of RTP development, it was necessary to use   statically assigned payload types because no other mechanism had been   specified to bind encodings to payload types.  It was anticipated   that non-RTP means beyond the scope of this memo (such as directory   services or invitation protocols) would be specified to establish aSchulzrinne & Casner        Standards Track                     [Page 6]RFC 3551                    RTP A/V Profile                    July 2003   dynamic mapping between a payload type and an encoding.  Now,   mechanisms for defining dynamic payload type bindings have been   specified in the Session Description Protocol (SDP) and in other   protocols such as ITU-T Recommendation H.323/H.245.  These mechanisms   associate the registered name of the encoding/payload format, along   with any additional required parameters, such as the RTP timestamp   clock rate and number of channels, with a payload type number.  This   association is effective only for the duration of the RTP session in   which the dynamic payload type binding is made.  This association   applies only to the RTP session for which it is made, thus the   numbers can be re-used for different encodings in different sessions   so the number space limitation is avoided.   This profile reserves payload type numbers in the range 96-127   exclusively for dynamic assignment.  Applications SHOULD first use   values in this range for dynamic payload types.  Those applications   which need to define more than 32 dynamic payload types MAY bind   codes below 96, in which case it is RECOMMENDED that unassigned   payload type numbers be used first.  However, the statically assigned   payload types are default bindings and MAY be dynamically bound to   new encodings if needed.  Redefining payload types below 96 may cause   incorrect operation if an attempt is made to join a session without   obtaining session description information that defines the dynamic   payload types.   Dynamic payload types SHOULD NOT be used without a well-defined   mechanism to indicate the mapping.  Systems that expect to   interoperate with others operating under this profile SHOULD NOT make   their own assignments of proprietary encodings to particular, fixed   payload types.   This specification establishes the policy that no additional static   payload types will be assigned beyond the ones defined in this   document.  Establishing this policy avoids the problem of trying to   create a set of criteria for accepting static assignments and   encourages the implementation and deployment of the dynamic payload   type mechanisms.   The final set of static payload type assignments is provided in   Tables 4 and 5.Schulzrinne & Casner        Standards Track                     [Page 7]RFC 3551                    RTP A/V Profile                    July 20034.  Audio4.1  Encoding-Independent Rules   Since the ability to suppress silence is one of the primary   motivations for using packets to transmit voice, the RTP header   carries both a sequence number and a timestamp to allow a receiver to   distinguish between lost packets and periods of time when no data was   transmitted.  Discontiguous transmission (silence suppression) MAY be   used with any audio payload format.  Receivers MUST assume that   senders may suppress silence unless this is restricted by signaling   specified elsewhere.  (Even if the transmitter does not suppress   silence, the receiver should be prepared to handle periods when no   data is present since packets may be lost.)   Some payload formats (see Sections 4.5.3 and 4.5.6) define a "silence   insertion descriptor" or "comfort noise" frame to specify parameters   for artificial noise that may be generated during a period of silence   to approximate the background noise at the source.  For other payload   formats, a generic Comfort Noise (CN) payload format is specified in   RFC 3389 [9].  When the CN payload format is used with another   payload format, different values in the RTP payload type field   distinguish comfort-noise packets from those of the selected payload   format.   For applications which send either no packets or occasional comfort-   noise packets during silence, the first packet of a talkspurt, that   is, the first packet after a silence period during which packets have   not been transmitted contiguously, SHOULD be distinguished by setting   the marker bit in the RTP data header to one.  The marker bit in all   other packets is zero.  The beginning of a talkspurt MAY be used to   adjust the playout delay to reflect changing network delays.   Applications without silence suppression MUST set the marker bit to   zero.   The RTP clock rate used for generating the RTP timestamp is   independent of the number of channels and the encoding; it usually   equals the number of sampling periods per second.  For N-channel   encodings, each sampling period (say, 1/8,000 of a second) generates   N samples.  (This terminology is standard, but somewhat confusing, as   the total number of samples generated per second is then the sampling   rate times the channel count.)   If multiple audio channels are used, channels are numbered left-to-   right, starting at one.  In RTP audio packets, information from   lower-numbered channels precedes that from higher-numbered channels.Schulzrinne & Casner        Standards Track                     [Page 8]RFC 3551                    RTP A/V Profile                    July 2003   For more than two channels, the convention followed by the AIFF-C   audio interchange format SHOULD be followed [3], using the following   notation, unless some other convention is specified for a particular   encoding or payload format:      l  left      r  right      c  center      S  surround      F  front      R  rear      channels  description  channel                                1     2   3   4   5   6      _________________________________________________      2         stereo          l     r      3                         l     r   c      4                         l     c   r   S      5                        Fl     Fr  Fc  Sl  Sr      6                         l     lc  c   r   rc  S         Note: RFC 1890 defined two conventions for the ordering of four         audio channels.  Since the ordering is indicated implicitly by         the number of channels, this was ambiguous.  In this revision,         the order described as "quadrophonic" has been eliminated to         remove the ambiguity.  This choice was based on the observation         that quadrophonic consumer audio format did not become popular         whereas surround-sound subsequently has.   Samples for all channels belonging to a single sampling instant MUST   be within the same packet.  The interleaving of samples from   different channels depends on the encoding.  General guidelines are   given in Section 4.3 and 4.4.   The sampling frequency SHOULD be drawn from the set:  8,000, 11,025,   16,000, 22,050, 24,000, 32,000, 44,100 and 48,000 Hz.  (Older Apple   Macintosh computers had a native sample rate of 22,254.54 Hz, which   can be converted to 22,050 with acceptable quality by dropping 4   samples in a 20 ms frame.)  However, most audio encodings are defined   for a more restricted set of sampling frequencies.  Receivers SHOULD   be prepared to accept multi-channel audio, but MAY choose to only   play a single channel.4.2  Operating Recommendations   The following recommendations are default operating parameters.   Applications SHOULD be prepared to handle other values.  The ranges   given are meant to give guidance to application writers, allowing aSchulzrinne & Casner        Standards Track                     [Page 9]RFC 3551                    RTP A/V Profile                    July 2003   set of applications conforming to these guidelines to interoperate   without additional negotiation.  These guidelines are not intended to   restrict operating parameters for applications that can negotiate a   set of interoperable parameters, e.g., through a conference control   protocol.   For packetized audio, the default packetization interval SHOULD have   a duration of 20 ms or one frame, whichever is longer, unless   otherwise noted in Table 1 (column "ms/packet").  The packetization   interval determines the minimum end-to-end delay; longer packets   introduce less header overhead but higher delay and make packet loss   more noticeable.  For non-interactive applications such as lectures   or for links with severe bandwidth constraints, a higher   packetization delay MAY be used.  A receiver SHOULD accept packets   representing between 0 and 200 ms of audio data.  (For framed audio   encodings, a receiver SHOULD accept packets with a number of frames   equal to 200 ms divided by the frame duration, rounded up.)  This   restriction allows reasonable buffer sizing for the receiver.4.3  Guidelines for Sample-Based Audio Encodings   In sample-based encodings, each audio sample is represented by a   fixed number of bits.  Within the compressed audio data, codes for   individual samples may span octet boundaries.  An RTP audio packet   may contain any number of audio samples, subject to the constraint   that the number of bits per sample times the number of samples per   packet yields an integral octet count.  Fractional encodings produce   less than one octet per sample.   The duration of an audio packet is determined by the number of   samples in the packet.   For sample-based encodings producing one or more octets per sample,   samples from different channels sampled at the same sampling instant   SHOULD be packed in consecutive octets.  For example, for a two-   channel encoding, the octet sequence is (left channel, first sample),   (right channel, first sample), (left channel, second sample), (right   channel, second sample), ....  For multi-octet encodings, octets   SHOULD be transmitted in network byte order (i.e., most significant   octet first).   The packing of sample-based encodings producing less than one octet   per sample is encoding-specific.   The RTP timestamp reflects the instant at which the first sample in   the packet was sampled, that is, the oldest information in the   packet.Schulzrinne & Casner        Standards Track                    [Page 10]RFC 3551                    RTP A/V Profile                    July 20034.4  Guidelines for Frame-Based Audio Encodings   Frame-based encodings encode a fixed-length block of audio into   another block of compressed data, typically also of fixed length.   For frame-based encodings, the sender MAY choose to combine several   such frames into a single RTP packet.  The receiver can tell the   number of frames contained in an RTP packet, if all the frames have   the same length, by dividing the RTP payload length by the audio

?? 快捷鍵說明

復制代碼 Ctrl + C
搜索代碼 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切換主題 Ctrl + Shift + D
顯示快捷鍵 ?
增大字號 Ctrl + =
減小字號 Ctrl + -
亚洲欧美第一页_禁久久精品乱码_粉嫩av一区二区三区免费野_久草精品视频
蓝色福利精品导航| 91美女片黄在线观看91美女| 国产乱人伦精品一区二区在线观看| 精品午夜一区二区三区在线观看| 日本不卡在线视频| 国产精品一卡二卡| 成人动漫一区二区| 欧美片在线播放| 国产三级一区二区| 亚洲午夜免费视频| 精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国内精品写真在线观看 | 久久综合精品国产一区二区三区| 日韩午夜激情免费电影| 国产欧美日韩精品一区| 午夜影院在线观看欧美| 国产一区二区三区美女| 精品视频在线视频| 中国色在线观看另类| 日韩av在线发布| 成人激情黄色小说| 欧美成人r级一区二区三区| 一区二区三区在线免费视频| 国产一区日韩二区欧美三区| 色悠悠久久综合| 久久影院午夜论| 亚洲午夜精品一区二区三区他趣| 国产凹凸在线观看一区二区 | 韩国av一区二区三区在线观看| 在线视频观看一区| 日韩一区二区三区av| 综合亚洲深深色噜噜狠狠网站| 久久精品国产成人一区二区三区| 欧美在线综合视频| 亚洲欧美日韩在线| 丁香激情综合五月| 日韩欧美自拍偷拍| 日韩av中文在线观看| 在线中文字幕一区二区| 国产精品不卡视频| 蜜臀av性久久久久蜜臀aⅴ四虎| 91精品国产色综合久久不卡蜜臀| 久久精品视频一区二区| 亚洲精品自拍动漫在线| 在线视频综合导航| 丁香亚洲综合激情啪啪综合| 最新中文字幕一区二区三区| 成人精品亚洲人成在线| 韩国精品主播一区二区在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品在线| 国内精品伊人久久久久av一坑 | 91精品国产乱| 欧美又粗又大又爽| 国产乱妇无码大片在线观看| 一区二区三区产品免费精品久久75| 精品国产凹凸成av人网站| 在线观看国产精品网站| 91免费版在线看| 欧美久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区 | 99re66热这里只有精品3直播| 久久成人免费日本黄色| 亚洲欧洲日韩在线| 亚洲精品视频一区二区| 国产精品三级av| 国产精品白丝jk黑袜喷水| 日韩av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲免费观看视频| 午夜精品久久久久影视| 精品国产电影一区二区| 日韩伦理av电影| 日韩午夜激情av| 国产精品18久久久久久久久 | 国产欧美一区二区精品仙草咪| 欧美一级艳片视频免费观看| 日韩一级二级三级| 26uuu精品一区二区三区四区在线| 26uuu成人网一区二区三区| 久久久不卡影院| 中文字幕亚洲欧美在线不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩国产手机在线 | 久久婷婷综合激情| 日韩成人免费看| 国产精品久久久久一区| 91福利国产成人精品照片| 蜜桃一区二区三区四区| 欧美极品少妇xxxxⅹ高跟鞋| 欧美日本在线播放| 国产一区二区免费在线| 亚洲成人自拍偷拍| 国产午夜一区二区三区| 6080国产精品一区二区| 粉嫩嫩av羞羞动漫久久久 | 三级影片在线观看欧美日韩一区二区| 国产精品视频九色porn| 7777精品伊人久久久大香线蕉完整版 | 成人中文字幕电影| 天天色图综合网| 国产欧美va欧美不卡在线| 欧美性受极品xxxx喷水| 黑人精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲欧美区自拍先锋| 欧美高清在线一区二区| 日韩午夜激情av| 欧美精品三级日韩久久| 成a人片国产精品| 国产91精品精华液一区二区三区| 亚洲v精品v日韩v欧美v专区| 亚洲乱码日产精品bd| 久久九九久精品国产免费直播| 欧美精品在线一区二区三区| 成年人网站91| 国产精品一区二区视频| 麻豆成人免费电影| 久久精品久久精品| 亚洲国产精品嫩草影院| 国产精品久久久久久久久果冻传媒| 日韩欧美国产三级| 欧美日韩黄色影视| 一本到高清视频免费精品| aa级大片欧美| 97精品久久久久中文字幕| 成人免费看片app下载| 99综合影院在线| 成人永久免费视频| 9l国产精品久久久久麻豆| 国产91精品入口| av在线不卡电影| 成人av片在线观看| 在线亚洲一区观看| 在线观看欧美精品| 欧美精选一区二区| 欧美狂野另类xxxxoooo| 日韩视频免费观看高清完整版在线观看| 色八戒一区二区三区| 51精品久久久久久久蜜臀| 成人手机在线视频| 在线观看亚洲a| 国产99久久久久久免费看农村| 成人综合激情网| 久久国内精品自在自线400部| 国产人成亚洲第一网站在线播放| 中文字幕一区二区三区不卡在线| 中文字幕一区二区三区在线不卡 | 伊人色综合久久天天| 亚洲精品伦理在线| 青青青伊人色综合久久| 久久99精品久久久久久| 不卡免费追剧大全电视剧网站| 成人黄色国产精品网站大全在线免费观看 | 日韩一区二区三区免费看| 精品国产欧美一区二区| 国产精品人成在线观看免费| 国产精品美女一区二区在线观看| 国产午夜精品一区二区三区嫩草| 久久久久综合网| 亚洲色图视频免费播放| 亚洲一区免费在线观看| 蜜桃久久av一区| 精品亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区三区| 成人在线视频首页| 日韩一区二区在线播放| 国产精品福利一区| 激情图区综合网| 成人动漫一区二区在线| 精品国精品国产| 欧美一级高清大全免费观看| 日韩毛片一二三区| 国产精选一区二区三区 | 国产黑丝在线一区二区三区| 日本道精品一区二区三区 | 91在线视频18| 久久免费电影网| 亚洲一区二区三区四区在线| 国产成人免费视| 欧美高清视频一二三区 | 成人黄动漫网站免费app| 欧美日韩国产成人在线91| 久久麻豆一区二区| 一区二区三区日韩精品| 日韩激情av在线| 成人av免费网站| 久久久久久久久久久久久夜| 中文字幕在线一区二区三区| 日韩激情中文字幕| 一本一道久久a久久精品| 欧美大片在线观看一区二区| 亚洲蜜桃精久久久久久久| 天天影视涩香欲综合网| 国产在线不卡一卡二卡三卡四卡| 在线观看视频一区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免费桃花 | 国产成人小视频| 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看 | 欧美一区日韩一区| xnxx国产精品| 免费高清在线一区| 欧美精品一卡二卡| 一区二区三区 在线观看视频| 91免费看片在线观看|