Subject: Re: [PATCH][CFT] bring ARM memory layout in line with the documented behaviourFrom: "Anders Larsen" <alarsen@rea.de>Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:15:21 +0200To: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>...>I still see  references  to  _armboot_start,  _armboot_end_data,  and>_armboot_end - which role do these play now? Can we get rid of them?>>How are they (should they be) set in your memory map above?_armboot_start contains the value of TEXT_BASE (0xA07E0000); it seemsTEXT_BASE and _armboot_start are both used for the same purpose indifferent parts of the (ARM) code.Furthermore, the startup code (cpu/<arm>/start.S) internally usesanother variable (_TEXT_BASE) with the same content as _armboot_start.I agree that this mess should be cleaned up.