?? http:^^www.cs.wisc.edu^~bart^537^quizzes^quiz4.html
字號:
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 17:25:15 GMTServer: NCSA/1.5Content-type: text/htmlLast-modified: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 16:13:50 GMTContent-length: 6112<html><head><title>CS 537 - Quiz #4</title></head><body><table border=0 width=100% align=center><tr><td width=25%><td width=50% align=center><b>UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON<br>Computer Sciences Department</b><td width=25%><tr><tr><td><b>CS 537<br>Spring 1996 </b><td><td align=right><b>Bart Miller</b><tr><td><td align=center><b>Quiz #4</b><br>Wednesday, February 28<td></table><h2>Messages: Readers/Writers Revisited</h2>You are to write the code to implement the access control for the<b>n readers/1 writer</b>problem.You will use<b>message passing</b>,as defined in the class notes and lecture,as your synchronization mechanism (i.e., you <i>cannot</i> use monitorsor semaphores).<p>Each <i>client</i> process that wants to read or write shared database willuse the <tt>StartRead()/EndRead()</tt> or<tt>StartWrite()/EndWrite()</tt>, as appropriate.These procedures are described below.<p><hr>You are to write the four client procedures,<i>plus</i> the code for a server process.<hr><dl><dt><tt>StartRead():</tt><dd>This procedure is called by a client process before itwants to have read access to the shared database.This procedure will not return until it is safe to read the data.Note that the actual reading of the data is not done in this procedure.<dt><tt>EndRead():</tt><dd>This procedure is called after a client process is done reading theshared database.<dt><tt>StartWrite():</tt><dd>This procedure is called by a client process before itwants to have write access to the shared database.This procedure will not return until it is safe to write to the data.Note that the actual writing of the data is not done in this procedure.<dt><tt>EndWrite():</tt><dd>This procedure is called after a client process is done writing theshared database.</dl><p>It might be useful to refer to Section 7 of the lecture notes.For this problem, do <b>not</b> be concerned with whether the readers orwriters get more priority.<h3>Solution: Version 1</h3>Here's a good, general solution.It may be a bit more complex than some of you used, but it has some usefulcharacteristics.<p>The most interesting characteristic isthat each client has its own mailbox for response.Having separate client mailboxes allows the clients to run on differenthosts in a network.<p>Note that I didn't write any queuing routines in my code.By clever use of the message system (in this example, by using <i>two</i>message sends for each start request), I was able to use the implicit queuingprovided by the mailboxes.<p><table width=100% border=1 align=center><tr><td><pre>void StartRead(){ char mboxname[MAXNAMESIZE]; MakeMboxName (mboxname); send ("request", STARTREAD); send ("start-read", mboxname); receive (mboxname, buff);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void EndRead(){ send ("request", ENDREAD);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void StartWrite(){ char mboxname[MAXNAMESIZE]; MakeMboxName (mboxname); send ("request", STARTWRITE); send ("start-write", mboxname); receive (mboxname, buff);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void EndWrite(){ send ("request", ENDWRITE);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void MakeMboxName (char *mboxname){ sprintf (mboxname, "mbox.%d", getpid()); CreateMailboxName (mboxname);}</pre></table><table width=100% border=1 align=center><tr><td><pre>void ReaderWriterServer (){ int value; int AR=0, WR=0, AW=0, WW=0; char mboxname[MAXNAMESIZE]; CreateMailboxName ("request"); CreateMailboxName ("start-read"); CreateMailboxName ("start-write"); while (1) { Receive ("request", &value) if (VALUE == STARTREAD) { if (AW + WW == 0) { AR++; Receive ("start-read", mboxname); Send (mboxname, 0); } else { WR++ } } else if (VALUE == STARTWRITE) { if (AW == 0) { AW++; Receive ("start-write", mboxname); Send (mboxname, 0); } else { WW++; } } else if (VALUE == ENDREAD) { AR--; if (((AR == 0) and (WW > 0)) { AW++; WW--; Receive ("start-write", mboxname); Send (mboxname, 0); } } else if (VALUE == ENDWRITE) { AW--; if (WW>0) { AW++; WW--; Receive ("start-write", mboxname); Send (mboxname, 0); } else { while (WR>0) { AR++; WR--; Receive ("start-read", mboxname); Send (mboxname, 0); } } } }}</pre></table><h3>Solution: Version 2</h3><p>Here's a slightly simpler one.This version has the client processes sharing mailboxes. This typeof approach is valid, but not as useful since it work work if the clientprocesses are on different hosts in a network.<table width=100% border=1 align=center><tr><td><pre>void StartRead(){ send ("request", STARTREAD); receive ("oktoread, 0);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void EndRead(){ send ("request", ENDREAD);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void StartWrite(){ MakeMboxName (mboxname); send ("request", STARTWRITE); receive ("oktowrite, 0);}</pre><tr><td><pre>void EndWrite(){ send ("request", ENDWRITE);}</pre></table><table width=100% border=1 align=center><tr><td><pre>void ReaderWriterServer (){ int value; int AR=0, WR=0, AW=0, WW=0; char mboxname[MAXNAMESIZE]; CreateMailboxName ("request"); CreateMailboxName ("oktoread"); CreateMailboxName ("oktowrite"); while (1) { Receive ("request", &value) if (VALUE == STARTREAD) { if (AW + WW == 0) { AR++; Send ("oktoread, 0); } else { WR++ } } else if (VALUE == STARTWRITE) { if (AW == 0) { AW++; Send ("oktowrite, 0); } else { WW++; } } else if (VALUE == ENDREAD) { AR--; if (((AR == 0) and (WW > 0)) { AW++; WW--; Send ("oktowrite", 0); } } else if (VALUE == ENDWRITE) { AW--; if (WW>0) { AW++; WW--; Send ("oktowrite", 0); } else { while (WR>0) { AR++; WR--; Send ("oktoread", 0); } } } }}</pre></table><hr><H4>Last modified:Thu Feb 29 10:13:49 CST 1996by<a href="http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~bart">bart</a></b></H4></body>?? 快捷鍵說明
復制代碼
Ctrl + C
搜索代碼
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切換主題
Ctrl + Shift + D
顯示快捷鍵
?
增大字號
Ctrl + =
減小字號
Ctrl + -