?? draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-06.txt
字號:
DNS Operations WG J. Jeong, Ed.Internet-Draft ETRI/University of MinnesotaExpires: November 6, 2005 May 5, 2005 IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server Information Approaches draft-ietf-dnsop-ipv6-dns-configuration-06.txtStatus of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft and is subject to all provisions of Section 3 of RFC 3667. By submitting this Internet-Draft, each author represents that any applicable patent or other IPR claims of which he or she is aware have been or will be disclosed, and any of which he or she become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with RFC 3668. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet- Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." The list of current Internet-Drafts can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-abstracts.txt. The list of Internet-Draft Shadow Directories can be accessed at http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html. This Internet-Draft will expire on November 6, 2005.Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).Abstract This document describes three approaches for IPv6 recursive DNS server address configuration. It details the operational attributes of three solutions: RA option, DHCPv6 option, and Well-known anycast addresses for recursive DNS servers. Additionally, it suggests the deployment scenarios in four kinds of networks, such as ISP, Enterprise, 3GPP, and Unmanaged networks, considering multi-solution resolution. Therefore, this document will give the audience aJeong Expires November 6, 2005 [Page 1]Internet-Draft IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server May 2005 guideline for IPv6 host DNS configuration.Jeong Expires November 6, 2005 [Page 2]Internet-Draft IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server May 2005Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3. IPv6 DNS Configuration Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1 RA Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.1.1 Advantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.2 Disadvantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.1.3 Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2 DHCPv6 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2.1 Advantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 3.2.2 Disadvantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.2.3 Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3 Well-known Anycast Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3.1 Advantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 3.3.2 Disadvantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.3.3 Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4. Interworking among IPv6 DNS Configuration Approaches . . . . . 15 5. Deployment Scenarios . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5.1 ISP Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5.1.1 RA Option Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 5.1.2 DHCPv6 Option Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5.1.3 Well-known Anycast Addresses Approach . . . . . . . . 17 5.2 Enterprise Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 5.3 3GPP Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5.3.1 Currently Available Mechanisms and Recommendations . . 19 5.3.2 RA Extension . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 5.3.3 Stateless DHCPv6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 5.3.4 Well-known Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.3.5 Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 5.4 Unmanaged Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.4.1 Case A: Gateway does not provide IPv6 at all . . . . . 22 5.4.2 Case B: A dual-stack gateway connected to a dual-stack ISP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.4.3 Case C: A dual-stack gateway connected to an IPv4-only ISP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 5.4.4 Case D: A gateway connected to an IPv6-only ISP . . . 23 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 6.1 RA Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6.2 DHCPv6 Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 6.3 Well-known Anycast Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 7. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 9.1 Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 9.2 Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 A. Link-layer Multicast Acknowledgements for RA Option . . . . . 32Jeong Expires November 6, 2005 [Page 3]Internet-Draft IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server May 2005 Intellectual Property and Copyright Statements . . . . . . . . 33Jeong Expires November 6, 2005 [Page 4]Internet-Draft IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server May 20051. Introduction Neighbor Discovery (ND) for IP Version 6 and IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration provide the ways to configure either fixed or mobile nodes with one or more IPv6 addresses, default routes and some other parameters [3][4]. To support the access to additional services in the Internet that are identified by a DNS name, such as a web server, the configuration of at least one recursive DNS server is also needed for DNS name resolution. This document describes three approaches of recursive DNS server address configuration for IPv6 host: (a) RA option [8], (b) DHCPv6 option [5]-[7], and (c) Well-known anycast addresses for recursive DNS servers [9]. Also, it suggests the applicable scenarios for four kinds of networks: (a) ISP network, (b) Enterprise network, (c) 3GPP network, and (d) Unmanaged network. This document is just an analysis of each possible approach, and does not make any recommendation on a particular one or on a combination of particular ones. Some approaches may even not be adopted at all as a result of further discussion. Therefore, the objective of this document is to help the audience select the approaches suitable for IPv6 host configuration of recursive DNS servers.Jeong Expires November 6, 2005 [Page 5]Internet-Draft IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server May 20052. Terminology This document uses the terminology described in [3]-[9]. In addition, a new term is defined below: o Recursive DNS Server (RDNSS): A Recursive DNS Server is a name server that offers the recursive service of DNS name resolution.Jeong Expires November 6, 2005 [Page 6]Internet-Draft IPv6 Host Configuration of DNS Server May 20053. IPv6 DNS Configuration Approaches In this section, the operational attributes of the three solutions are described in detail.3.1 RA Option The RA approach is to define a new ND option called the RDNSS option that contains a recursive DNS server address. Existing ND transport mechanisms (i.e., advertisements and solicitations) are used. This works in the same way that nodes learn about routers and prefixes. An IPv6 host can configure the IPv6 addresses of one or more RDNSSes via RA message periodically sent by a router or solicited by a Router Solicitation (RS) [8]. This approach needs RDNSS information to be configured in the routers doing the advertisements. The configuration of RDNSS addresses can be performed manually by an operator or other ways, such as automatic configuration through a DHCPv6 client running on the router. When advertising more than one RDNSS option, an RA message includes as many RDNSS options as RDNSSes. Through the ND protocol and RDNSS option along with a prefix information option, an IPv6 host can perform its network configuration of its IPv6 address and RDNSS simultaneously [3][4]. The RA option for RDNSS can be used on any network that supports the use of ND. However, it is worth noting that some link layers, such as Wireless LANs (e.g., IEEE 802.11 a/b/g), do not support reliable multicast, which means that they cannot guarantee the timely delivery of RA
?? 快捷鍵說明
復制代碼
Ctrl + C
搜索代碼
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切換主題
Ctrl + Shift + D
顯示快捷鍵
?
增大字號
Ctrl + =
減小字號
Ctrl + -