?? 84.txt
字號:
發信人: fervvac (高遠), 信區: DataMining
標 題: Re: 貝葉斯網絡屬不屬于數據挖掘?
發信站: 南京大學小百合站 (Wed Dec 26 01:57:56 2001), 站內信件
Thx. I guess I didn't make myself clear.
My question is that is rough set etc. popular? I think Bayesian is widely
used in papers and products.
Or more specifically, what is the advanateg of each approaches, i.e.,what
kind of problems can be best solved using either methods?
thx.
【 在 yaomc (白頭翁&山東大漢) 的大作中提到: 】
: You can one Doctor's literature about ROUGH SET on Medicine Informatics
: on our WEB files download area. Perhaps its name is main.pdf.
: 【 在 fervvac (高遠) 的大作中提到: 】
: : Just curious. Limited by my knowledge, why the most approaches I saw in
: : Data Mining paper does not use anything like rough set, lattice, etc? On the
: : other hand, I do see a lot of paper using Baysian, both by DM people and
: : AI people?
: : The only paper on rought set I saw is from China.
--
※ 來源:.南京大學小百合站 bbs.nju.edu.cn.[FROM: 飲水思源BBS]
?? 快捷鍵說明
復制代碼
Ctrl + C
搜索代碼
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切換主題
Ctrl + Shift + D
顯示快捷鍵
?
增大字號
Ctrl + =
減小字號
Ctrl + -