The 30_all_gcc34-arm-ldm-peephole.patch from Debian was conflicting with the newer 36_all_pr16201-fix.patch, so i cut out the hunk from it that was causing problems and grabbed an updated version from upstream cvs.Index: gcc/config/arm/arm.c===================================================================RCS file: /cvsroot/gcc/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm.c,vretrieving revision 1.432retrieving revision 1.433diff -u -r1.432 -r1.433--- gcc-3.4.4/gcc/config/arm/arm.c	29 Mar 2005 03:00:23 -0000	1.432+++ gcc-3.4.4/gcc/config/arm/arm.c	1 Apr 2005 11:02:22 -0000	1.433@@ -5139,6 +5139,10 @@ int adjacent_mem_locations (rtx a, rtx b) {+  /* We don't guarantee to preserve the order of these memory refs.  */+  if (volatile_refs_p (a) || volatile_refs_p (b))+    return 0;+   if ((GET_CODE (XEXP (a, 0)) == REG        || (GET_CODE (XEXP (a, 0)) == PLUS 	   && GET_CODE (XEXP (XEXP (a, 0), 1)) == CONST_INT))@@ -5178,6 +5182,17 @@ 	return 0;        val_diff = val1 - val0;++      if (arm_ld_sched)+	{+	  /* If the target has load delay slots, then there's no benefit+	     to using an ldm instruction unless the offset is zero and+	     we are optimizing for size.  */+	  return (optimize_size && (REGNO (reg0) == REGNO (reg1))+		  && (val0 == 0 || val1 == 0 || val0 == 4 || val1 == 4)+		  && (val_diff == 4 || val_diff == -4));+	}+       return ((REGNO (reg0) == REGNO (reg1)) 	      && (val_diff == 4 || val_diff == -4));     }